As part of the 50th annual conference of the Mormon History Association which took place at the Utah Valley Convention Center, a new generation of historians collaborated to present a more appealing view of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints to outsiders. This year, the association deemed it appropriate to commemorate the life of founder, Leonard J. Arrington, who served as LDS Church historian (1972-1982), and whose era is remembered as “Camelot” because of the openness and idealism in the study of Mormon history unlike before, and not equaled since.

A New Generation of Historians Needed

According to Deseret News, J.B. Haws, a professor of church history and doctrine at Brigham Young University who spoke at the conference on Saturday, 6 June 2015, commented:

However, my sense of it is that this current era — this current moment — is something rather different than that Camelot era. It feels less experimental and more mainstream, even as it is as bold and daring — in terms of historical output and publishing — as anything that came out of the 1970s.

J.B. HawsHaws further explained that at the end of the Arrington period journalists and other outside observers had noticed a tension “between professional historians and some in the church’s hierarchy over how much humanness should come through in the biographies of prophets.” He also stated that it was “an external controversy more than this internal, philosophical tension that really brought the complex interplay of faith and history in Mormonism into national consciousness.”

At various times, the true origin of The Church of Jesus Christ has been questioned by outside sources. Unfortunately, those with fraudulent intent, such as Mark Hoffman, who used forged documents from 1980-1985 in an attempt to discredit the validity of the Church’s traditional narrative about its origins, have left indelible marks and have given false impressions about the Church. In a further attempt to cover up his deceitful acts, Hoffman perpetrated bombings which claimed the lives of two persons. Haws stated, “The lasting mid-1980s media impression was that the LDS Church, secretive and shadowy, guarded its archives with deadly seriousness — and because of this, Mormonism looked different in the public’s eyes.” This reaction was reflected in the difference between a poll taken in 1977 which found that 54 percent of Americans favored Mormons, and a poll taken 14 years later, in 1991, which found that only 27 percent of the American people favored Mormons.

A Dramatic Shift in the tides of the Mormon History Controversy

The tides of the Mormon history controversy seemed to shift favorably when then Church President, Gordon B. Hinckley, did an interview with Mike Wallace on “60 Minutes” in the spring of 1966 in which he expressed a new attitude of openness in the Church’s hierarchy. Also, in 1977, during the sesquicentennial reenactment of the Mormons’ cross-country pioneer migration, national and international attention was focused once again on Salt Lake City and on Mormon history. During that time, the Church graciously opened its doors and invited scores of journalists visiting Salt Lake City to view its records.

Richard Bushman HistorianAbout the same time, Richard Bushman, professor of history at Columbia University, was beginning his work on a biography of Joseph Smith which he titled “Rough Stone Rolling.” He convened the first of what would become an annual summer seminar for graduate students at BYU. His original intent was to gather archival material for his book, however, that did not pan out as planned. Nevertheless, the seminars were successful in several unprecedented ways: (1) a network of young scholars was formed, (2) students had a chance to be introduced to leading practitioners, and (3) a venue was created to explore questions of faith and scholarship.

Haws further commented about the seminar:

This seminar and its participants are making a significant mark on the way Mormonism is being presented in this new century, not only because of positions in classrooms across the country, but also through their rapidly proliferating publications.

New Leading Voices on Mormonism

Professor David HollandHe also stated that alumni from the seminar such as Kathleen Flake, newly appointed to the Mormon Studies chair at the University of Virginia; Patrick Mason, Howard W. Hunter chair of Mormon studies at Claremont Graduate University in California; and David Holland, now at Harvard Divinity School, are listed among the leading voices on Mormonism in the academic world.

According to the Deseret News article, Bushman is quoted as having said, “Their prominence as media sources has come because they are fearless … they feel perfectly confident in speaking about Mormon topics in a scholarly venue. They know the voice; they know the kind of learning they need in order to speak authoritatively.”

Haws also pointed out that historians who studied with Bushman are now filling positions in the Church’s History Department. Some of these people include recently appointed Assistant Church Historian and Recorder Reid Neilson; Matthew Grow, director of publications overseeing the monumental Joseph Smith Papers project, and staff members Mark Ashurst-McGee, Jed Woodworth and Steven Harper.

He attributes many factors that helped bring about a new openness in Church history to include the way the internet has changed the world.

About Keith L. Brown
Keith L. Brown is a convert to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, having been born and raised Baptist. He was studying to be a Baptist minister at the time of his conversion to the LDS faith. He was baptized on 10 March 1998 in Reykjavik, Iceland while serving on active duty in the United States Navy in Keflavic, Iceland. He currently serves as the First Assistant to the High Priest Group for the Annapolis, Maryland Ward. He is a 30-year honorably retired United States Navy Veteran.

Copyright © 2019 Mormon History. All Rights Reserved.
This website is not owned by or affiliated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (sometimes called the Mormon or LDS Church). The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the position of the Church. The views expressed by individual users are the responsibility of those users and do not necessarily represent the position of the Church. For the official Church websites, please visit LDS.org or Mormon.org.

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This

Share This

Share this post with your friends!